Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00730
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
M&T BANK v. KYUNG WHA HAN AND SANG TAEK HAN et al
as 2:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
KYUNG WHA HAN AND SANG TAEK HAN, PNC BANK N.A., CITIBANK N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Peter Dang et al v. Citigroup Corporate Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02230
Plaintiff:
Peter Dang and Roy Fenn
Defendant:
Citigroup Corporate Holdings, Inc. doing business as Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Lee et al v. PayPal, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02718
Plaintiff:
Josephine Lee and Citigroup Corporate Holdings, Inc. doing business as Citibank, N.A.
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Elahe Safarzadeh v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 5:2021cv01772
Plaintiff:
Elahe Safarzadeh
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Does 1 to 100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv07347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
