Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Weybright v. Speck et al
as 6:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Brogan M. Weybright
Defendant:
Aaron Speck, Lane Regional Air Protection Agency, Lane County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Olson, Daniel v. Sauk County et al
as 3:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Olson
Defendant:
Sauk County, Aegis Corporation, Cross Jenks Mercer Maffei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ryan Edner v. Michelle Dietrich, et al
as 22-1664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ryan C. Edner and Ryan Christopher Edner
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle Dietrich, Judicial Officer, Cecil Naatz, Attorney, Jacob Birkholz, Attorney and others
Anotta et al v. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality et al
as 3:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Moyata Anotta and NW Metals, Inc.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Richard Whitman, Leah Feldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Edner v. Dietrich et al
as 0:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Edner
Defendant:
Michelle Dietrich, Cecil Naatz, Jacob Birkholz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021at01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
