Cases 11 - 20 of 760
SHELTON v. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
FELICIA Y. SHELTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Price et al
as 6:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Felicia Henderson
Defendant:
Isaiah Price, Joshua Memminger, Dwayne Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McQueen v. Flowers (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tenika McQueen
Defendant:
Felicia Franklin Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bradford v. Mass Transportation Authority
as 2:2024cv10789
Plaintiff:
Felicia Bradford
Defendant:
Mass Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. DoorDash et al
as 1:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Felicia Scott
Defendant:
DoorDash, Uber and Instacart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
