Cases 11 - 20 of 1,139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sophia Wilansky v. Paul Bakke, et al
as 24-1919
Plaintiff:
Sophia Wilansky
Defendant:
Paul D. Bakke, In his personal capacity, Thomas M. Grosz, In his personal capacity, Matthew J. Hanson, In his personal capacity and others
Glen Martin, Jr. v. CalArk, et al
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
Glen Allen Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
CalArk and Kevin Jackson, Driver Manager
Toon v. Spann et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steven Glen Toon
Defendant:
Officer Michael Andrew Spann, Officer Jonathan Sholar and The City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Nuttall v. Michigan City City of et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tracey Nuttall and Tracey Nuttall personal representative
Defendant:
City of Michigan City, Michigan City Police Officer Matthew Babcock, Michigan City Police Officer Rene Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHOES et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
SHOES and M. Alicea X.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Green v. Cheny
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Cordarriel Green
Defendant:
Glen A. Cheney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levine v. Project Renewal
as 1:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Morris Glen Levine
Defendant:
Project Renewal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
