Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,038
Loney v. Dennis et al
as 3:2024cv02832
Plaintiff: Carrie R. Loney
Defendant: Anthony Dennis, Hampton Gardner, Medgar Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03347
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Biggs
as 24-30164
Plaintiff: Jevin Williams and Glendale Hampton
Defendant: Daniel Biggs and Daniel Biggs, individually and his official capacity as an officer for the Orleans Levee District Police
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5304
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hampton v. Woodmen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Jonathan Woodmen, Kerry Corass, Katholyn Runnels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Tucker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Lane Tucker, Curtis Vic, Christopher Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Tulane University of Louisiana et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant: Tulane University of Louisiana Counseling Center, Nataurean Watts, Terrence Huggins and others
Plaintiff: Alexander Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?