Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Lackawanna Transport Company v. William Hughe
as 16-2366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LACKAWANNA TRANSPORT COMPANY, a West Virginia Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. HUGHES, individually and as Chairperson of the Wetzel County Solid Waste Authority
Doe et al v. Mayfield City School District Board of Education et al
as 1:2016cv00930
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Mayfield City School District Board of Education , Phillip Price , James A. Loewer and others
Cross_defendant:
Estate of Dean T. Ochi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackawanna Transport Company v. Hughes
as 5:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Lackawanna Transport Company
Defendant:
William J. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGilmer v. Hughes et al
as 3:2015cv00419
Plaintiff:
William James McGilmer
Defendant:
Dezmond J. Hughes , Joel Callies and f/n/u Cato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv08036
Plaintiff:
Fisher J Hughes
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart , Delphine Bridges and Roxanne Boutte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Starofsky v. Hughes
as 4:2013cv04096
Plaintiff:
Richard G Starofsky
Defendant:
Andrew J Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Stockton Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv02251
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams
Defendant:
Stockton Police Department, Bruce Morris, J. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01664
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hughes,Jr. v. Bridges et al
as 1:2013cv05770
Plaintiff:
Fisher J. Hughes,Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Bridges and Sargeant Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Di Rocco v. County Of Nassau et al
as 2:2012cv04777
Defendant:
Thomas B. Corona, County Of Nassau, J. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
John Di Rocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
