Cases 11 - 20 of 254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
STRATTON v. CITY OF KANNAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
KATHY STRATTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, J. M. LIVENGOOD, M. T. HOEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
P. et al v. Uvalde et al
as 1:2022cv01252
Plaintiff:
Crystal P., Daniel P., Andrea V. and others
Defendant:
City of Uvalde, Uvalde City Police Department, Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. J.M. Smucker Company, The et al
as 5:2021cv04038
Plaintiff:
Cedric Mack
Defendant:
Focus Workforce Management, Inc., J.M. Smuckers and J. M. Smucker Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Shadmani v. Barnes
as 3:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
MR AMIR SHADMANI and Amir Shadmani
Defendant:
OFFICER J.M. BARNES, Officer J. M. Barnes, Officer A. G. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
