Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-36022
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35996
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35955
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00478
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Hancock v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi et al
as 4:2012cv00055
Plaintiff: John Hancock
Defendant: City of Greenwood, Mississippi , Byron Granderson and Jesse Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS-YATES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 1:2012cv02243
Plaintiff: JOAN STEVENS-YATES
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DAVID ODOM, EDNA ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv03150
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv01794
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YATES v. HANCOCK
as 2:2007cv04390
Plaintiff: JOAN S. YATES
Defendant: JOHN HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?