Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Williams v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv12490
Defendant:
Sergeant Johnson, John Doe Officer 2, John Doe Officer 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 2-50, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH WINKLE and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GERRISH v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv02021
Plaintiff:
CHARITY GERRISH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER #2, FNU EDWARDS, RONALD REHMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Petra Campos v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2016cv02349
Plaintiff:
Ms Petra Campos
Defendant:
John Doe Officer 1, John Doe Officer 2, John Doe Officers 3-10 and others
Crawford et al v. McCabe et al
as 2:2016cv13263
Defendant:
Ryan McCabe , John Doe Officer 1, John Doe Officer 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Crawford and Michelle Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Janis v. Carter et al
as 4:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Gary Janis
Defendant:
Arthur Carter , James Welch, III , Ron Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macaluso v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv01739
Plaintiff:
Steven Macaluso
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Joseph Struck, Pamela Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUE v. THALKEN et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
THOMAS D THALKEN, JOSEPH F BATAILLON, KATHRYN KENEALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millwood v. Menands Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv01519
Plaintiff:
Horace M. Millwood
Defendant:
Menands Police Department , John Doe Officer #1 and John Doe Officer #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
