Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Roberto Durand v. Lorin Taylor, et al
as 22-16047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIN M. TAYLOR and LYNN BIGLEY
Roberto Durand v. Lorin Taylor, et al
as 22-15980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIN M. TAYLOR and LYNN BIGLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Sharon Gleason, et al
as 22-35446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Plaintiff:
ALASKA NATIVE CHILDREN & FAMILIES
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON L. GLEASON, JONAS M. WALKER, BRYAN SCHRODER and others
TAYLOR v. TAYLOR
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
MARY FRANCES TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Roberto Durand v. Lorin Taylor, et al
as 22-15739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIN M. TAYLOR and LYNN BIGLEY
Wilkins v. Duncanville Independent School District et al
as 3:2022cv01015
Plaintiff:
Brittany Wilkins
Defendant:
Duncanville Independent School District, Duncanville Independent School District Board of Trustees, Duncanville Independent School District Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Marvin Gerber v. Henry Herskovitz, et al
as 22-1097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN GERBER
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY HERSKOVITZ, GLORIA HARB, TOM SAFFOLD and others
Marvin Gerber, et al v. Henry Herskovitz, et al
as 22-1075
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GERBER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOCTOR MIRIAM BRYSK
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY HERSKOVITZ, GLORIA HARB, TOM SAFFOLD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
