Cases 11 - 20 of 189
Ocegueda et al v. Polk County et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Ivan Ocegueda, Estate Isaac ocegueda and Yuleni zavala
Defendant:
Polk County, Sheriff Mark Garton and Deputy Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Tate Prows v. City of Oxford, OH, et al
as 23-3920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATE DAVID PROWS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OXFORD, OH, CHIEF JOHN A. JONES, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Smith v. Perkins et al
as 2:2023cv01931
Plaintiff:
John Michael Smith
Defendant:
Richard Perkins, Todd L. Moody and Christina M. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. Haddadin et al
as 5:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Zeid Haddadin, Kyle Trsinar, Emmalee Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ernster
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY, Bradley Aubin, Mark Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
TROOPER ADAM ROBERTS, TROOPER BRIAN ROBERTS, TROOPER CHADWICK ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
