Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Dydzak v. Schwab et al
as 4:2016cv04799
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dydzak
Defendant:
Charles Schwab , Molly C. Dwyer, Alex Kozinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mary Margaret Sanchez v. Witkin & Neal Inc et al
as 8:2014cv00745
Defendant:
CZ Master Association, Does, EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Sanchez
Mary Margaret Sanchez v. Witkin & Neal Inc et al
as 8:2014cv00747
Defendant:
CZ Master Association, Does, EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Sanchez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dauven et al v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 3:2013cv00844
Defendant:
Elizabeth Balkovic Allan, Teresa Balkovic, Kingsley W. Click and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara G. Dauven, Christiana C. Dauven and Theodore (Ted) E. Dauven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bick Holdings Inc. et al v. United States Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 4:2013cv00462
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Bick, Jr. , Bick Group, Inc. , William Joseph Bick and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
