Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,723
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: James Harris
Defendant: Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Matthew Sorensen v. Skullcandy, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04553
Plaintiff: Matthew Sorensen
Defendant: Skullcandy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
John Burks v. Jason Tate, et al
as 24-1933
Plaintiff: JOHN BURKS
Defendant: JASON TATE, MATTHEW WIERZCHOWSKI and ROSS LAUTENBACH
Marshall et al v. Town Of Bladensburg Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv01549
Plaintiff: Matthew Marshall and Maria Day-Marshall
Defendant: Town Of Bladensburg Maryland, Bladensburg Police Department, Tyrone Collington, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wollersheim v. Garcia et al
as 2:2024cv01004
Plaintiff: Mason Wollersheim
Defendant: Richard Garcia, Justin Morse and Matthew Mesko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Estate of Ronquale M Ditello Scott Jr v. Racine County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff: Heather Blersch
Defendant: Racine County Sheriff's Department, Christopher Schmaling, MEnD Correctional Care PLLC and others
Other: Ronquale Ditello Scott Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROMELAND v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01566
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BROMELAND
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and ALBERT ABULIAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Jones v. Syed Shah
as 24-1949
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: DR. SYED SHAH
Matthew Jones v. Fouad El Chidiak
as 24-1950
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: DR. FOUAD EL CHIDIAK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?