Cases 11 - 20 of 357
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McKinsey-Pace v. Tilley et al
as 6:2023cv01775
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Jerry Tilley and Michael Siemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael McMahon et al v. The City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09815
Plaintiff:
Michael McMahon, Teresa Batson, Jeannine Bedard and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Eric Garcetti, Karen Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-40656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pace (PS) v. Prose et al
as 1:2023cv02847
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pace
Defendant:
Susan Prose, Lewis Babcock and Scott T. Varholak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trethaway v. Pizano et al
as 3:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Scott Trethaway
Defendant:
Joseph Pizano, John Morgan, Joseph Dominick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
