Cases 11 - 20 of 94
ATU v. New Orleans Regional Transit
as 23-30113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Amalgamated Transit Union and Valerie Jefferson
Defendant / Appellee:
New Orleans Regional Transit Authority and Alex Wiggins
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Bronson v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bronson
Defendant:
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Montachusetts Regional Transit Authority
as 22-1569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL M. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTACHUSETTS REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Howell v. Lowell Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2022cv11027
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Lowell Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Young Israel of Tampa, Inc. v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority
as 22-11787
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YOUNG ISRAEL OF TAMPA, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
