Cases 11 - 20 of 34
PHILLIPS et al v. JAMES et al
as 2:2015cv01139
Plaintiff:
GLADYS V. PHILLIPS, PEGGY J. PHILLIPS, JOSEPH D. PHILLIPS, 3rd and others
Defendant:
RICHARD JAMES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
James et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv03737
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome James, Frederick James and Richard James
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, F. Marino, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuke et al v. Nichols et al
as 0:2014cv02802
Plaintiff:
Richard James Stuke, Latoy Company and Representing You, Inc.
Defendant:
Tina L. Nichols, Magic Cleaning Service, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Phillips, Jr. v. Richard James, et al
as 14-2768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH D PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD JAMES, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Plunkett v. Roundtree et al
as 2:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lee P. Plunkett
Defendant:
George M. Roundtree , Richard James, Department of Family and Children Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMONS v. JORDAN
as 5:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES LAMONS
Defendant:
MISTY JORDAN, THERESA JORDAN, BETHAINE MILFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS FAMILY v. JAMES et al
as 2:2013cv01196
Plaintiff:
PHILLIPS FAMILY
Defendant:
RICHARD JAMES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Anderson, Sr. v. Judge Wendy Berger
as 12-15233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES ANDERSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDY W. BERGER, JUDGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
