Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dandridge v. Ohl et al
as 2:2018cv02039
Plaintiff:
Dana L Dandridge
Defendant:
Connie Ohl, Gavin Earp and Robert A McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-20784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oliver Mitchell, III v. United States Department, et al
as 17-56657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVER B. MITCHELL III
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ROBERT A. MCDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, DONNA BEITER, in her individual capacity and others
McDonald et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2017cv02166
Plaintiff:
Robert Hernandez McDonald, Jr. and Olivia Inez McDonald
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Florence Coolidge Justice Court, Brett Eisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-56270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sweitzer v. McGuinn et al
as 1:2017cv01741
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Sweitzer
Defendant:
Colleen McGuinn, Dario J. Broccolino, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 17-1122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Daniel Shaw
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert A. McDonald, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Mara Davis, EMS Chief Terry Vogt and others
Defendant:
Merit Systems Protection Board, New York Office and Judge Maureen Briody
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
