Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Faber v. Garcia
as 1:2018cv00472
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Faber
Defendant:
Christa Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Faber v. Smith
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Faber
Defendant:
Terrance Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David M. Hopper, et al v. Montgomery County Sheriff, et al
as 17-3175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HARRY G. BEYOGLIDES, JR., Special Administrator of the Estate of Robert A. Richardson, Sr., Deceased and DAVID M. HOPPER, Special Administrator of the Estate of Robert Andrew Richardson, Sr., Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF, Phil Plummer, TED JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN LEWIS, Sergeant and others
ESTATE OF TAMMY PEREZ v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2016cv00645
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., CHRISTINA ANDERSON, ROBERT ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF TAMMY PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davenport v. Keith et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Edmond Davenport
Defendant:
Sam Keith , Randy Cartwright , Billy G. Roughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WADE v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
E K WADE
Defendant:
JEFF MILLER, GARY ACKERMAN, SANDY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
E K Wade
Defendant:
Jeff Miller, Gary Ackerman, Sandy Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
