Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ruffin El v. Parent
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruffin El and Michael Ruffin Jr
Defendant:
Bruce Parent, Lake County and McColly Real Estate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Simone Ruffin v. Dudek and Associates, et al
as 23-55415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMONE RUFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DUDEK AND ASSOCIATES
Cross Defendant:
TEKSYSTEMS, INC. and TEKSYSTEMS GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PETER v. TAVISTOCK AT MAYS LANDING HOME OWNER ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PETER
Defendant:
TAVISTOCK AT MAYS LANDING HOME OWNER ASSOCIATION, INC., ERIC D. MANN, PAUL D. AARONSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruffin v. Linnabary
as 1:2022cv06145
Plaintiff:
Latonya Ruffin
Defendant:
Ian K Linnabary, Karen Yarbrough, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meyer et al v. Havens et al
as 4:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Krista Meyer, K.J., K.A. and others
Defendant:
Officer Tyson Havens, 1-5 John/Jane Doe and John/Jane Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
