Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Leftwich et al v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2020cv10881
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dan Leftwich and Lisa Leftwich
Defendant:
Team Leader Steven McInchak, John Doe, Rockwood, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Scheffler v. Kaplan, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv03310
Defendant:
Kaplan, Inc. and Richard H. Kyle, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00952
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Other Undisclosed BODA Attorneys, Russell Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. City of Blaine et al
as 0:2018cv01757
Defendant:
City of Blaine and District Court Administrator of the Tenth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. New Hope, City of et al
as 0:2018cv01690
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Defendant:
New Hope, City of , Richard A. Trachy , Ivy S. Bernhardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beigler v. Gibler et al
as 1:2017cv03421
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C Beigler
Defendant:
Erin Gibler , Juan Leon , John Scheffler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. SCHEFFLER et al
as 1:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. REED, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN SCHEFFLER, TRACY KILMER and BOROUGH OF PALMYRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. McDonough et al
as 0:2015cv03707
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Defendant:
Mark McDonough, Joe Price and City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Estate of Martie Clark et al v. Sickman et al
as 1:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sickman , Linda Clark , Mark Forrester and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County of, Greg Hartmann, Chris Monzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
