Cases 11 - 20 of 1,703
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, David Wilder and Cody Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Old School Sales, LLC et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Old School Sales, LLC doing business as Old School Vapor and Sak Wholesale, LLC
Defendant:
Brent Cooper, Don Brite, Andrew Burdett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Newsome et al
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lee Smith
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Kevin Seibert, Hallie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berstler (PS) v. Colorado Springs Police Department
as 1:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Christina Berstler
Defendant:
Colorado Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Armendariz, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE ARMENDARIZ and CHINOOK CENTER
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, DANIEL SUMMEY, in his individual capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Swain et al v. Routt County Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Martha Swain, Sue Swain, O. A. and others
Defendant:
Routt County Department of Human Services, Kristin Hintz, Camilla Haight and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
