Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gilberti v. Padar et al
as 2:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gilberti, Jr.
Defendant:
Padar, Carmine Marceno, Lexington Middle School and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Cuara R. v. Pentagon et al
as 2:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Constantino R. Cuara and Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Pentagon, United States Army, United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Dodge County Sheriff et al
as 8:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
James A. Davis and Debra A. Davis
Defendant:
Dodge County Sheriff, Judge Geoffrey Hall, Lamson, Dugan, Murray, PLC a Nebraska Profressional Corp doing business as Pentagon Federal Credit Union LegalDept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Cole v. State of Florida, et al
as 23-11620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD MERTON COLE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and PENTAGON
Showers of Herbs, LLC v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2023cv11122
Plaintiff:
Showers of Herbs, LLC and Christopher Tucker
Defendant:
Homeland Security, U.S. Dept. of, Federal Bureau of Investigations, The Pentagon and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Livia Scotto v. Maimonides, et al
as 22-3136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVIA M. SCOTTO
Defendant / Appellee:
MAIMONIDES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAUL EWING and others
Ronald Emrit v. United States Naval Intelligence
as 22-2149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES NAVAL INTELLIGENCE, LLOYD AUSTIN, Secretary and PENTAGON/ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
