Cases 11 - 20 of 183
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FOSTER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2023cv04820
Plaintiff:
IVAN FOSTER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JOHN DOES and JIM DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutton v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Hutton
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, WRAL News Station Personnel and The Former Landlords and Former Landlords' Business Affiliates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Okoro v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv09178
Plaintiff:
Nkemdirim Jennifer Okoro
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, THE FORMER LANDLORD AND THEIR BUINESS AFFILIATES and WRAL NEWS STATION PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
