Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Virgo v. Rogers
as 1:2013cv05368
Plaintiff:
Virgillio Virgo
Defendant:
Williams Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Om et al v. Melero et al
as 4:2012cv05498
Plaintiff:
Kamaji Om, Krsnaya Om and Sukia Tara Aushadhalay
Defendant:
Melero, Kalacek, Gregory Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mcnamee v. Clemens
as 4:2012cv02010
Plaintiff:
Ryan Mcnamee
Defendant:
William Roger Clemens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sheila McCullum v. Kenneth Tepe, et al
as 11-3424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHEILA MCCULLUM, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Timothy Hughes
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH TEPE
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO, BUTLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, RICHARD K. JONES and others
Sheila McCullum v. Richard Jones, et al
as 11-3427
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHEILA MCCULLUM, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Timothy Hughes
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD K. JONES, THERESA DIETZ, Sergeant and WILLIAM ROGERS
Defendant:
KENNETH TEPE, BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO, BUTLER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
WRIGHT v. TAYLOR et al
as 5:2011cv00933
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WRIGHT
Defendant:
JEFFREY C. TAYLOR, MICHAEL A. MISH, WILLIAM ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
