Cases 21 - 30 of 341
Archer v. Vigil-Richards et al
as 1:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Irene Archer
Defendant:
Jessica Vigil-Richards, John Doe Mendoza, Hobert Sharpton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archer v. HGRL
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Archer
Defendant:
HGRL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bejarano v. Ben Archer Health Care Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Raelene Bejarano
Defendant:
Ben Archer Health Care Clinic and Candace Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Riley's American Heritage Farms, et al v. James Elsasser, et al
as 23-55516
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RILEY'S AMERICAN HERITAGE FARMS, a California corporation and JAMES PATRICK RILEY, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ELSASSER, STEVEN LLANUSA, HILARY LACONTE and others
Defendant:
CLAREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gofan v. Gustafson et al
as 0:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Saye Henry Gofan, Jr.
Defendant:
Cameron C. Gustafson, Ryan Olson, William Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
