Cases 21 - 30 of 1,063
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sarah Norris v. City of Asheville
as 24-1206
Plaintiff:
SARAH BODDY NORRIS, ABIGAIL TEMOSHCHUK-REYNOLDS, AMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, DEBRA CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Asheville City Manager, D. TYRELL MCGIRT, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Director of the Asheville Parks and Recreation Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bloomquist v. State of Utah, et al
as 24-4022
Plaintiff:
DARRELL C. BLOOMQUIST
Defendant:
STATE OF UTAH, LEONARD ISAACSON, MARK WATKINS and others
Watkins v. The Resurrection Project
as 1:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
James Watkins
Defendant:
The Resurrection Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
The Estate of CMW et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
The Estate of CMW, Sydney Watkins and Lisa Lewis
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Lashauna Candler Griffin, Wendy Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austell (PS) v. Company, The et al
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Carmen Austell
Defendant:
Company, The, UC Memorial Hospital, Adult Protective Services and others
Sutton v. Strickland-Lucas et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Montanique Latrice Sutton
Defendant:
James Strickland-Lucas, Fulton County Sheriff Department, Atlanta Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
