Cases 21 - 30 of 4,107
Serrant v. Perlman et al
as 4:2024cv11353
Plaintiff:
Crystal Serrant
Defendant:
Jeffrey Perlman, Law Offices of Jeffrey Perlman, Akiva E. Goldman and others
Alexander Asanov v. FBI
as 24-1461
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER N. ASANOV
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BELINDA KELLER SUKEENA, TANYA A. PLEKAN and others
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Daniel Craig, et al
as 24-11610
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
DANIEL J. CRAIG, In his Official and Individual Capacities, MATHEW ROBINS, In his Official and Individual Capacities, ASHA JACKSON, In her Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Megens-Sedor v. Priolo et al
as 6:2024cv06303
Plaintiff:
Alexander Megens-Sedor
Defendant:
Nicholas Priolo and Todd Baxter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Megens-Sedor v. Priolo et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Alexander Megens-Sedor
Defendant:
Nicholas Priolo, Todd Baxter and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rejistre v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rejistre
Defendant:
Adam Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hottes v. Barajas
as 1:2024cv03793
Plaintiff:
Alexander F. Hottes
Defendant:
Jose Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
