Cases 21 - 30 of 180
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Shelton v. AT&T Services Inc.
as 1:2023cv03538
Plaintiff:
Jarod Shelton
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Adimora-Nweke v. CenterPoint Energy, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv03155
Plaintiff:
Ernest Adimora-Nweke
Defendant:
CenterPoint Energy, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., North Fort Bend Water Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lee v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
R. Michael Lee
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., victor manuel medrano, City Of Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mendez v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2022cv11010
Plaintiff:
Monica L. Mendez
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
