Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Crawford v. AT&T et al
as 2:2012cv14781
Plaintiff:
Anitra E. Crawford
Defendant:
AT&T, CIA, FCC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Hubbard v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2011cv00073
Defendant:
Whitley County, Kentucky , Kenneth Mobley , Robert O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson et al v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2010cv00354
Plaintiff:
Shawnda Lawson
Defendant:
Whitley County, Kentucky , Kenneth Mobley , Robert O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
THROWER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
MARLENE THROWER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , ESTELLE B. RICHMAN , KEVIN T. CASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collins et al v. Ostrowski
as 2:2010cv02095
Plaintiff:
Dustin Collins , Lawrence Moye , Debra Blanchard and others
Defendant:
Thomas Ostrowski
Petitioner:
Ernesto Perez and Deborah Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Claxton v. Colusa County, et al
as 10-15844
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL D. CLAXTON
Defendant:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF COLUSA
Defendant - Appellant:
COLUSA COUNTY and STEPHEN HACKNEY
McLaughlin v. Claxton Hepburn Hospital et al
as 1:2009cv07619
Plaintiff:
Peter A. McLaughlin
Defendant:
Claxton Hepburn Hospital, Towns of Ogdensburg, Ogdensburg Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
