Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosemarie Thomas v. C L E C O, et al
as 18-30944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSEMARIE D. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CLECO POWER, L.L.C., incorrectly identified as Cleco and TRENT MCKINLY
Thomas v. C L E C O et al
as 5:2017cv01119
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie D Thomas
Defendant:
C L E C O and Trent McKinly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nikita Smith, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 17-1907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIKITA T. SMITH and KEVIN D. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, BASHAWN GAINES, Police Officer, WILLIAM MORRISON, Police Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Thomas v. Jackson et al
as 1:2016cv03033
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Third-Party Medical Service Provider for the Fulton County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Archuleta v. Moya et al
as 1:2016cv00801
Defendant:
Eric Moya , Jacquaan Matherson , New Mexico State Police and others
Plaintiff:
D Thomas Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2016cv11882
Plaintiff:
Nikita T Smith and Kevin D Thomas
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , John Gaines, John Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollowell v. Arizona Department of Child Safety et al
as 2:2015cv02045
Plaintiff:
Veronica R Hollowell
Movant:
Vivian Epps
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Child Safety, Gregory McKay, Monique D Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
