Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azadpour v. City of Euless et al
as 4:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Mostafa Aram Azadpour
Defendant:
City of Euless , Mary Lib Saleh , Tim Stinneford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephens et al v. Bristol Park Apartments et al
as 4:2011cv00557
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Stephens , Natasha Stephens , TS and others
Defendant:
Bristol Park Apartments, Ledic Management Inc and JRK Residential Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
LEE et al v. PADILLA et al
as 2:2011cv01463
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEE , PATRICK O'CONNOR , ALLEN DELEONE and others
Defendant:
TOMAS PADILLA , CHARLES K. ZISA , CITY OF HACKENSACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv06680
Plaintiff:
Jessie Harvin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Donald Lee and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens et al v. Bristol Park Apartments et al
as 4:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Stephens, Natasha Stephens, Tayler Stephens and others
Defendant:
Bristol Park Apartments and Ledic Management Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dean Vargo, et al v. Plum Bor, et al
as 09-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN A. VARGO, an adult incompetent, by his parent and natural guardian PATRICIA A. VARGO
Defendant - Appellee:
PLUM BOR, PLUM BOR POL DEPT, ROBERT PAYNE, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
