Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Coway et al v. Romero et al
as 6:2021cv02125
Plaintiff:
katja coway and Morgan marks
Defendant:
Thomas Romero, Anthony Green, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONOVAN et al v. Doe I et al
as 1:2021cv20499
Plaintiff:
CHINEDU ERNESTO, CORTEZ NATHAN, BLAKE RATCLIFF and others
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 7, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COY v. GUY et al
as 3:2020cv15947
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 7, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS STRIKE TASK FORCE, DANIEL MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Vivint Inc., Dr. M. Burrows, Wal-Mart Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pellerin et al v. Lafayette Consolidated Government et al
as 6:2020cv01380
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Pellerin and Cedrick Pellerin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv07502
Defendant:
John Doe 3, Raymond Gerola, Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv07046
Defendant:
John Doe 8-30-17a, The City of New York, James O'Neill and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Bennett et al
as 1:2020cv11866
Defendant:
Michael Gomes, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Parrish v. Cathey et al
as 3:2020cv00406
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin V. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Castle et al
as 2:2020cv02417
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-5, Matthew Richmond Davis, Michael Shane Dulaney and others
Plaintiff:
Jaleta Clark, Alorea Hardwick, Ernestine Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
