Cases 21 - 30 of 578
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doe I et al v. Fulton County Schools et al
as 1:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I and John Doe
Defendant:
Fulton County Schools, Fulton Academy of Science and Technology, Founding Fourteen, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
June v. Lansden et al
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Karen June
Defendant:
Magistrate John S. Lansden, Clinton Guthrie, Robert S. Leni, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
June v. Lansden et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Karen June
Defendant:
Judge John S. Lansden, Clinton Guthrie, Robert S. Leni, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The New Budget Buy & Sell Inc. et al v. The County Of Suffolk
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
The New Budget Buy & Sell Inc., June Sarno and James Sarno
Defendant:
The County Of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
