Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv03572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Rowe et al
as 7:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
James L. Hamilton and James L. Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Michael Rowe , Pikeville Independent School District and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
N.T.,et al v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv00356
Defendant:
Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners , Andres A. Alonso , Dale J. Halterman and others
Plaintiff:
N.T. and Rachael Mooring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce et al v. Union City Police Department
as 1:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Pierce and Barbara L. Hamilton
Defendant:
Union City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Tenet Health System
as 1:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Hamilton
Defendant:
Tenet Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Indigo Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Indigo Investments, LLC, Edward L. Hamilton and Barbara A. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Deibel et al v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2008cv03215
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Deibel and Aaron Ross
Defendant:
Lolando L. Hamilton, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
