Cases 21 - 30 of 81
NULL v. MCCALMONT TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv01314
Defendant:
ORRIE DUANE MANNERS, BUREAU VERITAS, DAVID L. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD NULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERZ v. SASSO et al
as 1:2018cv02817
Defendant:
RICHARD L. YOUNG, MITCH MCCONNELL, SEAN PERSIN and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Banks et al v. City of Gonzales et al
as 3:2018cv00634
Plaintiff:
Dorestine Banks, Fredrick Banks, Robert Banks, Jr and others
Defendant:
City of Gonzales, Gary Ferrari, Gonzales Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant:
EVAN BAYH, LAURA BINFORD, BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018ct03029
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERZ v. SIMON et al
as 1:2018cv00001
Defendant:
EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO, BRENDAN CARR and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Herz v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Wendy Herz
Defendant:
David F. Hamilton, Richard L. Young, Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
