Cases 21 - 30 of 701
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamonte Jackson-Gibson, et al v. Reginald Beasley, et al
as 23-2020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAMONTE JACKSON-GIBSON and TORIEL DIXON
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGEANT REGINALD BEASLEY
Defendant:
OFFICER JUSTIN HEARN and OFFICER JAMES FIELDS
Rider v. Mercy Care
as 2:2023cv02373
Plaintiff:
Lamont Rider
Defendant:
Mercy Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Rider v. California State Controller's Office
as 2:2023cv02556
Plaintiff:
Lamont Rider
Defendant:
California State Controller's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Kansas Department for Children and Families
as 23-3224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON LAMONT WHEELER
Defendant / Appellee:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
LOGAN v. LAMONT et al
as 3:2023cv21174
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, JOHN CARNEY, CHARLIE BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. New York City et al
as 1:2023cv08976
Plaintiff:
Brett D. Johnson
Defendant:
New York City, Zeff Blacer Bareburgers, Pinkberry's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. Lamont
as 23-1344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie Grant, Jr., Jennifer Hamilton, Michael Stiefel and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Lamont, Jr., in his official capacity, James Rovella, in his official capacity, Patrick Griffin, in his official capacity and others
Dobek et al v. Sansom et al
as 3:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Irene Dobek and Clinton Prentice
Defendant:
Scott M Sansom, Michael Walsh and Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
