Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Swann v. Penske et al
as 1:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Penske and J. Taylor
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swann v. Penske et al
as 1:2020mc00024
Defendant:
Penske and J. Taylor
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carrillo v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Martha Hirschfield, Hope L Swann, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Refugio Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altman et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2020cv02180
Defendant:
Sheriff David Livingston, Sara Cody, Edgardo Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Swann, Firearms Policy Coalition, Roman Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards et al v. Department of Building Inspection of The City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2020cv01242
Defendant:
Edward Sweeney, Mauricio Hernandez, Department of Building Inspection of The City and County of San Francisco and others
Plaintiff:
Six Dogs LLC, Dennis Richards and Rachel Swann
Not Classified By Court:
Rodrigo Santos and John E. Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol v. Reinhart
as 2:2019cv02173
Defendant:
Lorraine J Reinhart, Unknown Howe, Tevis Reich and others
Plaintiff:
Rev Carol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swann v. Slater et al (PLR1)
as 1:2018cv00314
Defendant:
Officer Hickman, Jerland Hurd and Mike Slater
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02834
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPEARMAN v. SOTELLO et al
as 2:2018cv02595
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
ANGELIQUE SOTELLO, ALONZO DAWSON, MELANIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
