Cases 21 - 30 of 140
Johnson v. Oranye et al
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Chantel Antoinette Johnson
Defendant:
Achike Christopher Oranye, Pinda McCoy, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Joseph Johnson v. Clair Sootsman, et al
as 22-1937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY CLAIR SOOTSMAN, DEPUTY CHANTEL EINHARDT and DEPUTY TALIAH HARRIS
Foster et al v. Emburg
as 6:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Chantele Foster and Jeremy Foster
Defendant:
Kevin Emburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01605
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Stephens
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Kasey Mike Faust, Conchetta Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Maestas v. Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County et al
as 6:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Chantelle Maestas
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County, Muskogee County Sheriff's Office, Andy Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Miller et al v. Crowley et al
as 6:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Chantell Miller
Petitioner:
Tyler Borill
Defendant:
City of Crowley and Jimmy James Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv03715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
