Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 80
De Los Santos et al v. Bosworth et al
as 3:2020cv00461
Defendant: Hon. Danny Chambers, Hon. Sydney Hewlett, Hon. Robert Mayfield and others
Plaintiff: Mr. Reynaldo A. De Los Santos and Mr. Ricardo De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10253
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09463
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00330
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Warden v. Harrington et al
as 2:2019cv00085
Defendant: Bernardo De Los Santos and Jeremy Harrington
Plaintiff: Howard Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lu v. Sprague et al
as 1:2018cv12544
Defendant: Anthony S. Owens, Kevin P Kerr, Nancy Mahan and others
Plaintiff: Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2018cv01517
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos
Plaintiff: Anthony James Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2018cv01516
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos
Petitioner: Anthony James Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cantu v. James Moody, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-40434
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL ENRIQUE CANTU
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES M. MOODY, ERIN S. LABUZ, also known as Erin S. Hayne, NATHAN HUSAK and others
De Los Santos v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv00427
Plaintiff: Alyssa De Los Santos
Defendant: City of Chicago, E. Jiminez, M. Renteria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?