Cases 31 - 40 of 715
Weaver v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Salinas Acosta Weaver and Baby Doe
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahone v. Marianna, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mahone
Defendant:
Marianna, City of, Daniel Strickland, Daniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Michael Swanson v. DOJ, et al
as 23-35305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SWANSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DOJ, MICHAEL MOSMAN, senior judge, YOULEE YIM YOU, mag. judge and others
Acosta v. The City of Peekskill Section 8 Department et al.
as 7:2023cv03106
Plaintiff:
Joseph Acosta
Defendant:
The City of Peekskill Section 8 Department and Jessica Ganus
Acosta v. TF Green Airport
as 1:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
TF Green Airport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Morris v. Trump
as 23-456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith S. Morris
Defendant / Appellee:
President Donald Trump, Comm. Andrew M. Saul, of Social Security, Nancy A. Berryhill, Dep. Comm. of Social Security and others
Defendant:
A.L.J. Roxanne Fuller, A.G. William P. Barr, Department of Labor, Secretary of State (N.Y.) and others
v. GOLSTEIN et al
as 3:2023cv00301
Defendant:
QUASEAN GOLSTEIN, JACQUELINE DUETTE, CITY OF TRENTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GOLDSTEIN et al v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
QUASEAN GOLDSTEIN and JACQUELINE DUETTE
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoute v. Acosta
as 1:2023cv10115
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stoute
Defendant:
Rosalin Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
