Cases 31 - 40 of 396
Clements et al v. Village of Dryden, New York et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Keionzie Clements and Eric Allen
Defendant:
Village of Dryden, New York, Town of Dryden, New York, David Sprout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia Barrera v. San Bruno Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Arturo Osiel Valencia Barrera
Defendant:
San Bruno Police Department, Kevin S. McMullan, Joe Valiente and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2945
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bruno v. Rodriguez
as 5:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Bruno
Defendant:
Martin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mpoy v. State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2022cv02149
Plaintiff:
Bruno K. Mpoy
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Montgomery County, Cpl Fultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
MPOY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02501
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHN BURST and DONIELLE POWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
