Cases 31 - 40 of 84
GARANS PROPERTIES, LLC et al v. CITY OF MOULTRIE, GEORGIA et al
as 7:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
LARRY FRANKLIN PROPERTIES, LLC, TIM D MCKEE, MICHAEL FOLSOM and others
Defendant:
DAVID MUNDT, WAYNE DEMONGA and MOULTRIE GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02043
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moultrie v. Heintz et al
as 4:2019cv04144
Defendant:
John McGehee, Carrie Elizabeth Clark, Baron Heintz and others
Plaintiff:
Unree Moultrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA v MCBRAYER
as 5:2019cv00215
Defendant:
Officer J A RILEY, Chief JAMES MORGAN, Sheriff GARY LONG and others
Plaintiff:
MYEL J TATE-BENSON and COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison v. Moultrie County Illinois et al
as 2:2018cv00957
Defendant:
Richard L Broch, James A Knecht, Lisa Holder White and others
Plaintiff:
Lyle Roger Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. DUKES et al
as 7:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GREEN v. MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT
as 7:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAKESHA GREEN
Defendant:
MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT, MOULTRIE, CITY OF, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
