Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cornish et al v. City of Fort Wayne The et al
as 1:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Cornish and A.N.C.
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne The , Thomas Strausborger , George Nicklow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CORNISH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, (PICC) et al
as 2:2014cv06920
Plaintiff:
JOHN CORNISH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, (PICC) , WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. , PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Kane v. Brian Lewi
as 14-1027
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW KANE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrew Dwayne Cornish
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN LEWIS, OFFICER JOHN LEWIS, OFFICER JENSEN SHORTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tauheedah S. Najee-Ullah et al v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2013cv07834
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security, Jami Cornish, Marion L Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Raushanah Najee-Ullah and Tauheedah S Najee-Ullah
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-10428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McElveen v. Calibre
as 13-34
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice McElveen
Defendant - Appellee:
Norberto Calibre, Mark Cornish and Thomas Ehret
McElveen v. Calibre et al
as 3:2012cv01454
Plaintiff:
Maurice McElveen
Defendant:
Norberto Calibre, Mark Cornish and Thomas Ehret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
