Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS et al v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2011cv00126
Plaintiff: BRITTANY PHILLIPS and ERIC D. REED
Defendant: HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH and A. FULTON MEACHEM, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Bates et al
as 3:2011cv00062
Plaintiff: Reginald D Reed
Defendant: Christopher W Bates, Kwasic S Heckard, Roderick Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Reed v. Ewald Automotive Group We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3186
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELVIN D. REED
Defendant - Appellee: EWALD AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
Uzomba v. Reed et al
as 5:2010cv00554
Defendant: District Attorney and Susan D. Reed
Plaintiff: Patrick Uzomba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00470
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Reed v. Ewald Automotive Group
as 2:2008cv00685
Plaintiff: Melvin D Reed
Defendant: Ewald Automotive Group
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Reed v. Ewald Automotive Group
as 2:2008cv00684
Plaintiff: Melvin D Reed
Defendant: Ewald Automotive Group
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Reed et al v. Bridgman, City of et al
as 1:2007cv01150
Plaintiff: Richard D. Reed and Maury E. Reed
Defendant: Bridgman, City of and Bridgman Zoning Board of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01802
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?