Cases 31 - 40 of 1,782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nutt v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Nutt
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces, Gabriel Aguirre and Aaron Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bright v. Yenchko et al
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
Malik Cedrick Bright
Defendant:
Jeffrey Yenchko, Victor Jurado, Hanna Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Olivier v. City of Spartanburg, South Carolina et al
as 7:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Olivier
Defendant:
City of Spartanburg, South Carolina and Stephen McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Akwesasne Mohawk Casino Resort
as 8:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Gabriel M. Rich
Defendant:
Akwesasne Mohawk Casino Resort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
