Cases 31 - 40 of 248
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-60391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Van Hook v. State of Idaho, et al
as 22-35463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD VAN HOOK
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, JOHN MEIENHOFFER, ALPS- PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Estate of Gabriel Strickland, et al v. Nevada County, et al
as 22-15761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF GABRIEL STRICKLAND, N.S., a minor guardian ad litem Leah Jolley and SHAWNA ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA COUNTY, SHANNON MOON, Sheriff, Nevada County, TAYLOR KING, Deputy and others
Williams v Nueces County, Texas, et al.
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
guy Williams
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, Sheriff J. W. Hooper, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hooper v. Multnomah County
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Louis Hooper
Defendant:
Multnomah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Brady et al v. Etheridge
as 3:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Rusty Two Feathers Br Brady and Cheley Hokanson Petris
Defendant:
C. Etheridge, Belinda Hooper, Davonna Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
