Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Snowden et al v. Prince George's County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Snowden , David Francis , Kevin Stewart and others
Defendant:
Prince George's County Department of Corrections, Mary Lou McDonough, Colonel Mark E Person and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Edokobi v. U.S. General Services Administration et al
as 8:2017cv02469
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant:
U.S. General Services Administration, Timothy Horne, Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Tenorio v. Village of Robbins et al
as 1:2017cv03981
Plaintiff:
Graciela Tenorio
Defendant:
Village of Robbins, Michael Harris and Unknown Robbins Police Department Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris et al v. Cleveland City Schools (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Harris and Michael Harris
Defendant:
Cleveland City Schools
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Harris v. The Los Angeles Police Department
as 2:2017cv01919
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
The Los Angeles Police Department
Hobson v. Harris
as 1:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Shawn Avery Hobson
Defendant:
Michael Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Harris v. The Los Angeles Police Department
as 2:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
The Los Angeles Police Department
Joseph David v. Marcus Nettles, et al
as 16-2388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DAVID
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS NETTLES, MICHAEL HARRIS, #6052, Illinois State Police Officer and MICHAEL WITT, Illinois State Poliec Lieutenant, #4829
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
