Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Elvira Fernandez, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 13-15714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVIRA FERNANDEZ, ESTATE OF DANIEL FRANK RODRIGUEZ and FRANK RODRIGUEZ, individually and as Co-Personal Represenative of the Estate of Daniel Frank Rodriguez deceased Daniel Frank Rodriguez.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX and RICHARD ALLEN CHRISMAN, Husband
Thomas v. State of Alaska District Attorneys Office Palmer AK et al
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
State of Alaska District Attorney's Office, Palmer, AK, Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. District Attorneys Office Palmer AK. et al
as 3:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office Palmer AK., Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Office of Public Advocacy et al
as 3:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas
Defendant:
Office of Public Advocacy, Beth Trimmer, Krista Maciolek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandles v. Batista et al
as 2:2012cv11773
Plaintiff:
John Eric Sandles
Defendant:
Andrew Batista, George C Steeh, Doug Smith and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012at00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Fernandez v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2011cv02001
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Richard Allen Chrisman, Unknown Chrisman and others
Plaintiff:
Elvira Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
