Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00768
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Neil
as 1:2017cv00652
Plaintiff:
Samuel Robinson , Markalo Harris , Eric Buig and others
Defendant:
Jim Neil and Gregory Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 2:2017cv04230
Defendant:
Jaime Imof, John Imof, Nassau/Suffolk Law Services and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brackbill v. Ruff et al
as 1:2017cv01046
Plaintiff:
Calvin E. Brackbill
Defendant:
Stephen J. Ruff, Gregory A. Hill, Ian L. Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kumar v. New York State Insurance Fund et al
as 1:2016cv08397
Plaintiff:
Yogesh Kumar
Defendant:
New York State Insurance Fund, Eric Madoff, William O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruff et al v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico et al
as 1:2016cv01140
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ruff , Crusoe Gongbay and Saqwan Edwards
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico , Kevin McCabe , Guadalupe Pete Guavera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruff et al v. McCabe et al
as 1:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ruff , Crusoe Gongbay and Saqwan Edwards
Defendant:
Kevin McCabe , Timothy Stump , Trace Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robert Mitchell v. 25th District Police Departmen, et al
as 16-2120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
25TH DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT, P/O BRANDON RUFF and PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
