Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Chan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03639
Plaintiff:
Sing Chan
Defendant:
Shu Hu Chen, Xiang Yi Chen, Gavin Choi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shu'el Bey v. State Of Florida
as 8:2013cv01359
Plaintiff:
Brother Sundiata Shu'el Bey
Defendant:
State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 13-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CHARLES MOORE
Interested Party:
MARC A. WHALEY, BOURNEWOOD HOSPITAL, IRINA MEZEHBOUSKY, MD and others
Mable v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Ezra Mable
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, Baltimore City Police Department, Ed Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
